Case study
West Berkshire – a 2-storey extension with porch and installation of solar panels
This case concerns a contentious application for a two-storey extension with an added porch and the installation of solar panels at Elm Cottage, nestled within the historic environs of Calcot Park, Calcot, Reading.
Elm Cottage, a property characterised by its simple and traditional design was the subject of a planning proposal that threatened to disrupt the architectural harmony and historical significance of its surroundings.
Main Issues
Impact on Local Character and Appearance: Our objection underscored the incongruity of the proposed extension with the local design ethos, as encapsulated by West Berkshire’s Core Strategy (Policy CS 14) and the NPPF 2023 guidelines. The extension’s disproportionate scale and intrusive positioning risked compromising the aesthetic integrity and spatial dynamics of the area, renowned for its leafy, open character and individually styled residences. The proposal, with its substantial forward projection and excessive bulk, not only clashed with the existing property line but also posed a stark visual imposition on the landscape, challenging the established architectural dialogue between space and form.
Impact on Heritage and Conservation: Planning Voice’s analysis highlighted the proposal’s potential to adversely affect the setting of the Grade II Listed East Lodge and the historically rich fabric of Calcot Park. Leveraging policies CS 19 from the Local Plan alongside National Policy, our objection articulated a persuasive argument against the encroachment on heritage assets. The juxtaposition of the modern extension against the backdrop of 18th and 19th-century parkland and architectural heritage was flagged as a direct challenge to the principles of heritage conservation, calling for a sensitive reconsideration of the development’s scope and design.
Impact on Neighbouring Residential Amenity: Addressing residential amenity, the objection delved into the proposed extension’s overbearing scale and its implications for privacy and light for neighbouring properties. It highlighted how the development, by introducing overlooking windows and encroaching upon communal vistas, would significantly detract from the quality of life of the residents, eroding the privacy and enjoyment of their properties.
Outcome
Withdrawn Application: The culmination of our concerted efforts and strategic objection resulted in the withdrawal of the planning application. This outcome not only underscored the validity and weight of the concerns raised but also affirmed our commitment to preserving the architectural and historical integrity of our communities. It exemplifies our ability to effectively mobilise local planning policies and heritage conservation principles in defence of our client’s interests and the collective well-being of the community.
